Use this form if the comment contains offensive or otherwise inappropriate content. An email message will be sent to our moderators who will take appropriate action if necessary.
 |
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
Use this form if the comment contains offensive or otherwise inappropriate content. An email message will be sent to our moderators who will take appropriate action if necessary.
|
|||||||
 Popular Projectors:Where to Buy:Research: | |||||||
Be careful what you ask for. 24fps is not only demanded by creators for it's beauty and non-realistic motion rendering, it also makes handheld, kinetic camera possible and beautiful on large screens. Everything from Bourne Ultimatum to Woman on the Edge of Nervous Breakdown would be unwatchable if shot at 60 or 120 fps.
Motion judder is only a real issue on certain shots (and we see it movie theatres all the time but we are used to it there.
Plus, this and many other articles about this issue are from people spending huge amounts of time evaluating images technically, not watching films. It's generally only a small subset of technicians that complain about 24fps.
As a filmmaker, I hear almost zero asking for anything but 24fps on new cameras. Audiences prefer it. To quote Stephen Colbert "The Market has spoken. 24fps wins".