Use this form if the comment contains offensive or otherwise inappropriate content. An email message will be sent to our moderators who will take appropriate action if necessary.
 |
|
|||||
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
Use this form if the comment contains offensive or otherwise inappropriate content. An email message will be sent to our moderators who will take appropriate action if necessary.
|
|||||||
There's no doubt that the Panasonic AE3000 offers alot more bang for the buck with it's features and performance and lower price. There's also no question that the HC6500 is a solid performer that will satisfy most mainstream folks. I'd recommend the AE3000, but if you can find a HC6500 for cheaper (I found mine at Best Buy as a close-out model for $2199) then go for it. I did originally had my heart set on the AE3000, but the price for the HC6500 was hard to resist - including a 3-year no interest they had going. In a nutshell, no regrets as I am really satisified with the performance and it is one of the quietest and lighter projector. However, I wouldn't pay $3,000 or more for this projector as there are better projectors at that price range.
Currently I am projecting a 120" screen at about 14 feet and it is a joy to watch. I am not missing the 120Hz features that are the new trend in LCD and projectors since I use this projector mainly for movie watching. If you watch alot of sporting events it's great, but for movies, it's a no-no.