Editor's Choice
Performance
Features
Ease of Use
Value
Intended Use:
DIY Home Theater
Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 Projector Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350
(add to Compare List)
Go to My Compare List

Street Price: $1,299
Contrast:50,000:1
Lumens:2000
Weight: 16.1 lbs
Resolution:1920x1080
Aspect Ratio:16:9
Technology:3 LCD
Lens:2.1x manual
Lens Shift:H + V
Lamp Life:4,000 (eco)
Lamp Cost:n/a
Warranty:2 year
Connectors:  S-Video, Composite, Component, RGB, HDMI 1.3a (x2), RS232
Video Formats:  480i, 480p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p/60, 576i, 576p

Epson PowerLite Home Cinema 8350
1080p Home Theater Projector

Bill Livolsi, October 4, 2010

The Epson Home Cinema 8350 arrives fresh from this year's CEDIA show, and it is a sight to see. Epson has really outdone itself this year--the Home Cinema 8350 is a sub-$1300 1080p projector that delivers some serious performance.

The Home Cinema 8350 is the successor of last year's Home Cinema 8100. The Home Cinema 8100 earned our Editor's Choice Award for being an exceptional value for the money. It had high brightness, great placement flexibility, and affordability both in purchase price and maintenance costs. The Home Cinema 8350 continues this tradition, bringing even better 1080p film and video performance into your home theater for less than $1300. There is no doubt this one earns this year's Editor's Choice Award for entry level 1080p home theater projectors.

Advantages

Image quality. There's no sense beating around the bush: the Home Cinema 8350 is a fantastic value. It produces a great picture for a very low price. Out of the box, its factory presets are geared for high light output in ambient light. So the first picture you see is bright, with decent color and average black level for illuminated rooms. To get it set for optimal video quality, the first order of business was to turn on Epson Super White, engage the auto iris, and change color temperature from 6500K to 7500K (more below on this). After these simple adjustments, the projector is transformed into an inexpensive 1080p powerhouse for dark room viewing. Epson Super White and the auto iris bring black level down, while highlights are brilliant and sparkling without any loss of detail. Color is accurate and true-to-life. These minor changes are all it takes to bring the Home Cinema 8350 into the big leagues.

Lumen output. The Home Cinema 8350, like its predecessor, is very flexible when it comes to lumen output. This variability is accomplished through a variety of image modes, ranging from the very bright Dynamic mode to the more subdued Cinema mode. Each mode is built around an intended application, and all are useful in at least some capacity.

Visual Apex

Dynamic is the preset to use in a bright room, as it produces the highest lumen output - 1507 lumens on our test sample. While this is a slight decrease from the Home Cinema 8100 which measured in the mid 1700s, it is still plenty of light for a room with a couple of small windows or table lamps. In this environment, a 100" diagonal image is probably the maximum you will want to consider--anything larger can make the picture appear too dim. Conversely, if you want to "punch up" the apparent brightness and contrast, use the zoom lens to shrink the image down to 60" or 80" diagonal. As far as color and contrast are concerned, color balance is exceptionally good for a Dynamic mode--this was true with the Home Cinema 8100 last year and it is true again now. While there is a slight greenish cast to the picture, it's nothing compared to the Dynamic settings on some competing units. Black level is not as deep as it is under the Cinema and Natural settings, but in a room with ambient light that will not matter.

Next Page
More Advantages
Review Contents: Advantages More Advantages Limitations Shootout vs Panasonic AE400U
 

Reader Comments(66 comments)

Posted May 17, 2012 7:52:15 AM

By Scott Humphrey

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I have a quick question I am hoping someone can answer. We just bought the Epson 8350 and I am having trouble hooking it up. We have a 4 foot HDMI cable running from the DVD player (Panasonic Blu-ray DVD DMT-BDT87) to the Receiver (Sony STRHH520) and then another long HDMI cable (35 ft) running from the Receiver to the Projector. We have sound but no picture. The projector is showing "no source" on all settings we try, so it appears the Receiver is for some reason not sending the picture to the projector. Off the top of your head can you think of anything we are doing wrong? Any reason why the DVD player or Receiver would not be compatible with the Projector? I am nearly 100% sure we have the HMDI ports accurate - I just think there has to be something I am missing. Thanks for your help!

Posted Apr 9, 2012 10:02:24 PM

By Chris

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I recently tried out the 8350 at an old theater I am helping turn in to a performing arts center. The original theater screen is still up. There is a large stage in front of the screen . I set the 8350 on the stage as far away from the screen as possible. This is about 25ft away. I was quite surprised how good it looked for being a home projector but I need to produce a larger and slightly brighter image. I can not move the unit any further back. Does anyone know of a projector that has a lens that can create a larger image in this situation?

Posted Feb 20, 2012 12:59:06 PM

By Jane

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
It doesnt really matter. 200 lumens is less than a 25 watt lightbulb. you wont notice any difference.

Posted Feb 18, 2012 10:29:22 AM

By Scott

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I am looking at the Epson 8350. My screen width is 110 inches, 80 inches high. My current projector is sitting 21 feet back from the screen. Will the Epson 8350 work? Doesn't have to fill the whole screen - just the width is what I am looking to get ok with. Thanks!

Posted Feb 8, 2012 2:14:13 PM

By Fefrank

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Markie is correct I meant to say 115 inches not 150 Thanks for the correction markie

Posted Feb 7, 2012 11:19:08 AM

By Markie

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Roughly: If your screen is x inches diagonal, the closest you can have the projector to the screen is .x feet, and the farthest is about 2 times that distance.

So at maximum zoom Mark can place his projector 11 feet from his 110 inch screen.

Fefrank said "I am currently at 12'5" from the screen right now and I could get the image to be 150' easily without full zoom."

If the projector is about 12.4 feet from the screen, you should be able to achieve an 124 inch image at maximum zoom.

If I'm mistaken, please correct.

Posted Feb 6, 2012 12:33:41 PM

By Fefrank

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
To Mark: Yes you will be able to get a 110' screen if you have the projector at 11' I am currently at 12'5" from the screen right now and I could get the image to be 150' easily without full zoom.

Greg: The Ben Q W6000 Is a great projector, I love DLP technology. I clean,sharp, and crisp especially the W6000 Because is a single chip dlp projector. Crispiness you are not going to get with any LCD projector excluding the panasonic AE4000U which is really sharp and crisp for being a 3LCD projector. I own the 8350 and I will tell you is a big bang for the buck and pretty sharp, but I've seen sharper. Plus it also depends on how your unit arrives. Epson has had a lot of issues with panel convergence. I have already returned my espon 4 times to finally get a good one, but epson's costumer service have bben very helpful and incredibely understanding of the problem. I have seen the Ben Q w6000 in action, is an awesome projector but you will be paying between 4 to 500 dollars more to get it for 500 more lumens of brightness (on paper, you never know) a little sharper picture and about the same color contrast and blakc levels.I am RBE (rainbow effect) sensitive so I think that the 8350 was a better bang for my buck. I recommend testing both projectors and see what is better for you eye. I also recommend the 8700 UB if you have the money for it, way better blacks and color contrast and way better sharpness. Good Luck

Posted Feb 1, 2012 9:19:07 PM

By Mark

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Does anyone know if I can achieve 110' screen if I mount the projector at 11 feet using the zoom?

Posted Jan 29, 2012 4:15:10 PM

By Greg hung

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
thoughts on the 8350 vs Benq w6000?

Posted Dec 30, 2011 11:37:13 AM

By Apellön

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
price is not an issue to me ... i can get the 8350 for 1200$ or get the epson 8700 UB for 1900$ ... i wonder with one to buy ... both look amazing ... what do you think i should go for ?

i m ok with anything under 2k ... I've heard that the 8350 doesn't match the 8700UB but i wonder if it's true... what do you guys think ?

Posted Dec 3, 2011 7:41:54 PM

By Mark L.

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
This is a follow up to my post. The Epson HC8350 which I bought for $999 last Black Friday just arrived today late afternoon. After fulfilling my social obligations, I proceeded to bring down my 5 year old 720P Sanyo PLV-Z4 and carefully ceiling-mounted the new 1080P Epson HC8350. It did not take very long to set up the 8350. Following Mr. Bill Livolsi's advise, I turned the Epson Super White ON, turned the Auto Iris ON and set the color temp to 7500K. Then, I popped the Avatar Blu-ray (a movie that I have seen at least a dozen times) to check out the 8350's performance. The moment an image appeared on my 110" Stewart FireHawk, I knew right away that everything that was written about the 8350 was correct. It was truly deserving of the 2010 Editor's Choice Award. I am extremely and totally happy of my purchase. Many thanks to you guys for reviewing this 'Super Projector' and for everyone who posted their experience.

Posted Nov 27, 2011 5:20:29 PM

By PDQuick

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Well I just purchase the 8350 on Black Friday 2011 at an amazing price. Well first and foremost my sons and I are blown away by the picture quality and the brightness in a very lighted room.. However 95% of the viewing will be in a blacked out room, just as impressive.

Well how did I come to buy this projector. My Runco CL-710 DLP just stopped working after 8 years. The cost just to have them look at it was $400.00 wow!!! . I figured with todays technology I could probably find a projector that would meet my needs at a fraction of the cost I paid for a 1080i/720p projector eights years ago. I could have purchase a small vehicle for what I paid for that Runco projector, pioneer Elite receiver, 93 inch screen and Klipsch 5.1 speakers with huge sub (Man Cave).

Watching blu-ray through the HDMI cable setting was Super Amazing, we felt like we could have just stepped into Avatar the movie.

Thanks for all the reviews they really helped in my selection process. Spend the money, you want be disappointed.

Posted Nov 21, 2011 8:00:31 AM

By Mark L.

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Thanks for your work in reviewing front projectors. I have the Sanyo PLV-Z4 a 720P LCD Projector which I bought in June 2006 literally due to your excellent review. Its been more than 5 years since then. While I still enjoy its excellent picture, at the back of my mind, I know that one day I will eventually upgrade to a 1080P projector. I had no idea that that day is going to come sooner when I saw your review of the Epson Home Cinema 8350. My Sanyo PLV-Z4 is still working fine but the Epson Home Cinema 8350 sounds like too good, way too good to pass up. Do you think the Epson 8350's performance is good enough reason to justify retiring my beloved still-running Sanyo PLV-Z4? Again, many thanks for all your hard work. It is because of you guys why I who knew nothing about front projectors bravely made the jump in 2005. And I have never looked back since then.

Posted Nov 17, 2011 4:18:21 PM

By Mark Leogreen

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Having HDMI length problems, run two cat 5e or higher for each hdmi connection and terminate with ethernet plugs. Use ethernet to hdmi converters (non-powered) only need two for each hdmi connection. Cat 5e simple to run and draw if required, less bulky and cheap. Will work to 100m. Do an ebay search on; 'HDMI to Cat5e/Cat6e Converter 1080P FullHD HDMI Cable' Cost approx $18 usd

Posted Nov 9, 2011 3:56:22 AM

By kevin

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
There are a couple of simple mathematical equations to determine your needs:

For throw distance you will need to take the Throw Ratio (found in the projector specs) and multiply it by width. D = W x Tr

Posted Oct 6, 2011 5:31:06 PM

By onethenumber

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
1st lamp replacement at 3162hrs mostly on dynamic, factory lamp.

Posted Sep 5, 2011 2:55:34 PM

By gazi hafiz

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
if your having trouble with the cables u can buy wireless HDMI transmitter from rocketfish.. its awesome... plus Epson 8350 is one of the best projector..

if u wanna see how i set it up go youtube.com/oo7hafiz

Posted Sep 2, 2011 9:51:09 AM

By Jeff McTague

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Just bought it from BestBuy for $1200 + $200 HDMI cables + $257 4-yr warranty that includes bulb replacement. My old projector did not have HDMI so I will try to fish the HDMI cable on the back of the coaxial cables. Told there is a wi-fi HDMI but could not find one.

With the help of this article, I will try to refine the Epson 8350. I'll let you know how it goes.

Posted Aug 29, 2011 9:40:54 PM

By Francis Mollay

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I bought one used epson 8350 projector it is good for my small business at Kimara DSM. People are watching and enjoying UK premier leagua. I do not know where Ican I get the lens?.

Francis Tanzania

Posted Aug 29, 2011 4:17:54 PM

By Eric

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Just picked up the 8350 after the Projector People price break and so glad I did. Granted you get the extra bulb but the 8700 at $800 more was a bit steep regardless of the increased refresh rate. Had an older Sanyo PLV-Z2 on component video and was really quite pleased with that picture, but the 8350 blows it away in every single category. The living room picture mode right out of the box is simply fantastic. With the Sanyo we had to really control the light level but now we get the same contrast with significant accent light on in the room, which we prefer as a family. If you're not a true videophile save the $800 bucks like I did - I upgraded my receiver and my screen and went full HDMI for less than the 8750. Excellent product.

Posted Aug 18, 2011 11:15:27 AM

By ItsMeSri

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I am new to this projector world. Initially I thought to buy Home Cinema 8700UB, After checking all web sites 8350 also works the same way. Now I am planning to buy 135'' fixed screen in 18'.9'' foot long room. So my question is How far (distance) I can hang projector for good picture quality on 135 screen

Posted Aug 18, 2011 9:47:00 AM

By ItsMeSri

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I am new to this projector world. Initially I thought to buy Home Cinema 8700UB, After checking all web sites 8350 also works the same way. Now I am planning to buy 135'' fixed screen in 18'.9'' foot long room. So my question is How far (distance) I can hang projector for good picture quality on 135 screen

Posted Aug 17, 2011 4:57:12 AM

By Jamy

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I have 2 questions about the 8350. My first is if it has closed captioning (can't seem to locate the info), and if so if it will display the cc on all resolutions or only some, and if so which ones? I've got a old 32" samsung HDTV that will only display cc on 480p or lower, and it's a must for myself. Also, after reading the comments I'm wondering if it's possible to ceiling mount this unit flush to the ceiling and still get a nice rectangle of a picture? This will be my first projector and I want to make sure it works! Thanks!

Posted Jul 26, 2011 8:14:06 AM

By Fabien

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
You write we can use it in france ... But all the wire are in the box to connect it here in 220v ? There is a switch on the EPSON ?

How we can use it please ... i want to buy it :p

Thanks Bye

Posted Jul 2, 2011 1:28:34 PM

By Christian

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Yes you can. This projector works fine in Europe with 230V and PAL

Posted Jun 24, 2011 1:05:57 PM

By havetobecrazytobuyepson

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
with so many problems why would any one by a etorl lamped epson,dust blobs, convergence,let alone lamp life.

Posted Jun 22, 2011 5:52:18 PM

By erik

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
i have the same comment - if your not completely parallel to the wall won't your image be tapered?

Posted May 22, 2011 10:31:27 PM

By ZEMR04

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Bought the 8350 last November. It is fantastic. We're running it on a 144" diagonal screen and people tell me that it feels like they're watching a TV, not a projector. Everything described in the review is 100% correct. I am delighted with this purchase. Thank you so much for the advice!!!

Posted May 20, 2011 2:48:38 PM

By ihab

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Can I use the 8350 in Europe with PAL DVD players ?

Posted Mar 6, 2011 5:30:56 AM

By Paul Brown

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
You may want to see about a signal enhancer (amplifier) for hdmi cables runs that are over 25 ft

Posted Feb 26, 2011 8:56:27 PM

By facefact

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I'm not familiar with the importance of the comparison specs for this model. All I know is that I connect my Blu ray 5.1 home theatre system through HDMI into my Epson 8350 on my 13 foot white wall and I am in movie theatre heaven! This projector is getting rave reviews all around for the price tag. I got mine for under a grand because it was an open box item and I paid 200.00 for a 2 yr warranty which covers anything from malfunction to bulb replacement and I am so glad I made this purchase.

Posted Feb 21, 2011 12:56:30 PM

By Howard

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Per Projector Central Specs-- Digital Keystone: No

Isn't keystone control important to have for set-up (lens shift, etc)???

Posted Feb 20, 2011 9:35:40 PM

By Craig

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I own an epson 6100, I was wondering if getting the 8350 would be a decent jump i'n picture clarity. The price is write but I'm wondering if it's worth it

Posted Feb 4, 2011 9:29:13 PM

By Robert Plourde

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I really want to buy this, but I'm nervous about all these problems that people are reporting. I have a good, professionally calibrated Optoma H31. Should I give this Epson a try?

Posted Jan 13, 2011 3:18:31 PM

By Randy

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Response to Hal's comment: It supports a 1080p/24 signal via 2-2 pulldown (doubling the framerate to 48Hz). Its working great on the 8350 I picked up last night. I'm actually having a signal strength problem on 1080p/60 with my standalone Blu-Ray player and using an HDMI switch but it clears up when the BD player changes to 1080p/24.

Worth noting: I did not have this signal strength problem with an Optoma HD66 I recently returned, it handled 1080p/60 with the same cabling and switch without issue so the 8350 may not be as good at handling HDMI signal loss over long cable runs.

Posted Jan 9, 2011 12:14:50 AM

By Hal Masonberg

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Is it bad that this model doesn't have 1080p/24?

Posted Dec 7, 2010 5:33:45 PM

By Sports

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
The specs for the 8350 says it is 60 Hz vs the 8700 which has 120Hz. I know this is a big deal with some flat screen TV's and sports, any issues watching fast paced sports with the 8350????? Definately need it to perform regardless of the sporting event I'm watching.

Posted Dec 7, 2010 4:21:47 PM

By Eloy

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
OK now ther is a Purple blooming i need to worry about..I was just about to buy the 8350 .you have no idea how much crap the Panasonic PT-AX 100U and 200u has cost me with the yellowing do to polarizing filter burn. Please let me Know asap if I should back of ..or buy

Posted Dec 4, 2010 6:44:19 PM

By Allen

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Purchased the 8350 last month. Out of the box was a pretty nice picture but then purple blooming start to appear. Called Epson directly to get a replacement and still waiting for delivery due to out of stock at Epson warehouse. I still have a Sony G70 CRT and will go back to it. I'm a little disappointed so far and this is my first digital.

Posted Dec 2, 2010 5:58:57 PM

By Baiju

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
After a long wait for the ae4000u I decided to get a 8350 today and now I am confused whether to open it or not. I have to a ceiling mount (4 yr old kid) and the auto zoom and focus on the panny would have come in handy. I still can reach the projector fairly easily. Would this be a major deal breaker?

Posted Dec 1, 2010 12:20:23 PM

By Stan

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
The specification page list the 8350 as 'anamorphic ready'. When using the HDMI input I can't change the aspect ratio. I assumed that anamorphic ready meant I could scale cinescope to full height to use a anamorphic lens. This is what my Panasonic AX-100 would let me do. It seems only the 8700UB will let you do this. Am I missing something?

Posted Nov 30, 2010 12:09:27 PM

By SBank

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Installing an Epson 8350 with 16:9 ratio, 120" screen. Epson website gives a throw range of 11'9" to 25'1". What is the ideal distance to celining mount? I have a deep room that is light controlled and can put it anywhere in this range.

Posted Nov 24, 2010 2:42:46 PM

By rob stoltenberg

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Anybody seen a pinkish glow in corners on dark sceens on epson 8350 ,also auto iris seems slow.51737

Posted Nov 20, 2010 3:00:09 PM

By Cary

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I agree. What's up with the White?

Posted Nov 20, 2010 6:12:45 AM

By Wally

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I bought Epson 8350 and now I have problem buying the right screen... (gray/white, gain, brand, size, and price) any recommendation will help...

Posted Nov 13, 2010 11:10:44 AM

By Math

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Just bought mine in Quebec. Very good projector for the price and great review up there ! thanks

Posted Nov 10, 2010 2:51:14 PM

By Gerry

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Hey there, when they say "horizontal range of 25%", what does that actually mean? I'm interested in the projector but I can't place directly back from screen. May have to be 3 feet off. Not sure if that impacts quality?

Posted Oct 24, 2010 9:27:57 AM

By GA_X

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Platte Pannekoek, thanks for the TW3200/3600 notes!

Posted Oct 14, 2010 4:12:40 AM

By Mike

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I wish it wasn't white. I ceiling-mount my projector in a theater room that has dark surfaces and white really doesn't look good.

Posted Oct 13, 2010 9:03:49 AM

By alan hutchinson

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
JVC just release the jvc 250 pro that's sub 3k price point which is the first time they released a projector in this price range it's the D-ILA piece. this should be serious contender to epson 8700 or panasonic

Posted Oct 11, 2010 11:30:52 AM

By Ferenzcy

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Anyone knows if Epson 8350 has some kind of Frame Interpolation? i've not found that information on epson's site. I'm almost convinced to get the Panny AE4000 but if the epson also has FI, i would give it a second thought.

Posted Oct 10, 2010 7:43:15 AM

By Platte Pannekoek

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I am not 100% certain, but based on the specs I would say the Euopean equivalent of the 8350 is the EH-TW3600: http://www.epson.co.uk/Projectors/Epson-EH-TW3600/Tech-Specs

One step down - and a few hundred euros cheaper - is the EH-TW3200: http://www.epson.co.uk/Projectors/Epson-EH-TW3200/Tech-Specs

Posted Oct 9, 2010 3:46:02 PM

By Lee

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I wish you would compare ANSI contrast figures. I find auto iris's annoying if the image is unmasked since the black bars vary in brightness with the iris's activist.

Posted Oct 8, 2010 2:42:55 PM

By Hal Masonberg

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
If I just read a bit further, I would have seen your comparison to the Panasonic! Makes my last question redundant. However, is Panasonic coming out with a new model that will give the Epson a serious run for its money?

Posted Oct 7, 2010 3:42:43 PM

By Nick

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Smart, by giving the PowerLite Home Cinema 8350 top ratings, this will give the Panasonic company more time to chew on lowering upcoming prices for their 'unannounced' 5000 model. They're going to have some serious contendors - even the little guys are packing a punch!

Posted Oct 6, 2010 10:54:39 AM

By SvirU

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Nobody really knows... even epson... it looks like there is a big mess in the "name" department in epson... c2fine... MLB... it should be inroganic...

http://www.epson.jp/e/products/device/htps/tech/tech3.htm

It looks like it is inorganic... but then again :) You cant confirm that :)

Posted Oct 5, 2010 10:15:06 PM

By MellamoJosh

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Bill, you totally brushed over the fact that the 8350 measured over 200 LESS lumens than the 8100. Epson goes out of their way to advertise that they use an ISO standard which is "a more rigid standard than the outdated ANSI lumens rating". Does Epson have an answer for this? Do you have any ideas as to why a supposedly brighter PJ would measure significantly less than the dimmer, previous model it replaced? I'm ready to pull the trigger on the 8350, but this is a yellow flag to me.

Posted Oct 5, 2010 6:50:33 PM

By Satish

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
How does 8350 compare with Epson 8700UB? is the extra $700-800 worth it?

How does 8700 compare to AE4000 Panasonic? Thanks

Posted Oct 5, 2010 4:52:07 PM

By Todd

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
The 6500UB has the Silicon Optix HQV, Frame Interpolation, 120Hz and a higher CR (75000:1). Oh and it's a little dimmer at 1600 ANSI Lumen. The 6500UB would seem to be about 10% dimmer when calibrated than the 8350.

Posted Oct 5, 2010 11:27:51 AM

By Adam

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
I'd be interested to see how the 8350 compares with the 6500UB. Any comment?

Posted Oct 5, 2010 10:23:35 AM

By Duke

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
The Epson now has (according to the Epson website) the inorganic panels (D7, C2fine spec that the 4400 has/had). In Europe I think the release date is sometime around mid-October.

Posted Oct 5, 2010 4:45:18 AM

By Adam

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Nice to see the comparison with the AE4000. It will be interesting to see how it compares to the 2010 Panny replacement for the AE4000 -- assuming that there is one. That should at a minimum reduce the price difference--and possibly change the performance difference, as well.

Posted Oct 4, 2010 9:52:41 PM

By Joco1114

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
What about the european edition of Epson 8350? Release date, name?

Posted Oct 4, 2010 6:11:58 PM

By Lorne

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Can it do 3D from a PC, a BR player, or Direct TV?

Posted Oct 4, 2010 5:23:42 PM

By Josh

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Any one else find it funny that Epson claims 200 extra lumens for the 8350 vs the 8100 and yet it actually has over 200 lumens less? Any idea why?

Posted Oct 4, 2010 5:10:37 PM

By Scott Koprowski

Post a Comment Alert Moderator
Does the 8350 now use inorganic panels? I know the 8100 it replaced still used organic panels.

Post a comment

Commenting on this article is easy and does not require any registration. Your email address is necessary for you to activate your comment once it has been submitted. It will not be shown to other site viewers. ProjectorCentral reserves the right to remove any comment at any time for any reason. Foul language is not permitted, nor are personal attacks. All comments should remain on topic.

Name:

Email Address:(used only to confirm your comment)

Your Comment:

(Enter the numbers as they appear to the left)