With all the hype surrounding new solid-state projection light sources, namely laser and LED, it might seem that the use-case for lamp-based projection is quickly fading away into the annals of history.
However, while LED and laser projectors do offer some significant maintenance and long-term cost benefits, their upfront higher costs can deliver some customers sticker shock, though in the sub-6000 lumen projector market, the prices have now dropped to the point that most will consider a laser projector a more economical choice.
Let's dive into what makes each technology unique, and where you might choose one over the other.
Lamp Projection
The tried-and-true projection lamp has been around for decades and has consistently undergone new innovations such as brighter light and increased life span. However, lifespans for much of its history were measured in hundreds of hours; it wasn't until the last 10 years or so that we began to see 1000+ hour projection lamps.
Along with the evolution of the lamps, the need to accomplish higher and higher lumen output led to the introduction of dual-lamp systems. This achieved the desired effect, but also increased the ongoing maintenance costs to keep the unit functioning.
More recent projector releases now boast lamp lifespans of 5,000 hours and even a 10,000-hour estimated lifespan if the projector is run in its "Eco" mode, which reduces lamp output for the benefit of longevity. With numbers like this, I'm hard-pressed to say that lamp-based projection is anywhere close to going away.
So where would one choose lamp-based over a solid-state solution? The easy answer is that lamp projectors are best for those who are only utilizing projection intermittently, such as a movie night once a month, or a couple times a week in a classroom. One could easily argue that churches, particularly small churches without a lot happening during the week, could still find a valuable use-case in the now lower-cost lamp projectors.
Nonetheless, one must consider the long-term impact of needing to replace lamps. Even with a long lifespan of 5,000 hours, by the time a small church experiences a blown projector lamp, what will be the availability of a replacement lamp? Will that replacement need to be found five years down the road? Perhaps ten years or more?
Still, I would say that in many instances, lamp-based projection is still very much a viable and more affordable solution.
LED Projection
Until fairly recently, most LED-driven projectors have not provided impressive numbers: low lumen output, low quality imaging chips producing less desirable imagery, and a lot of overseas, off-brand manufacturers flooding the market with sub-par products have left a lot of consumers wary, and for good reason.
However, in 2017, Hitachi was the first to announce a 3,500 lumen LED projector, which opened the doors to more manufacturers like Optoma, Panasonic, Epson, and Casio to release either all LED or hybrid LED/laser projectors.
As with laser engines, the typically more affordable LED models may boast 20,000 hours or more of operation and virtually no maintenance (most still have filters that require cleaning at recommended intervals). These projectors can greatly aid those who have projectors installed in hard-to-reach locations or who use their projector every day and hence would burn through a lamp at a faster pace. Frequent use means better long-term value in this case. Another benefit that may not be immediately obvious is that using a solid state light source can mean less generated heat, which may have significant impact in small spaces or unique orientations, such as when you're mounting a projector at a non-standard angle. Museums, art installations, and environmental projection immediately come to mind as potential use-cases for this feature.
LED light sources have been around in the lighting industry for a long time, but are fairly new to the professional projection market, and as such, do have a ways to go before they catch up to projection lamps and laser-based projection in terms of light output. But, given the incredible amount of money being thrown into LED research, it would not surprise me to see brighter and even longer-lasting LED solutions coming to market as early as late 2019 and early 2020. We have already seen new models introduced for the home theater and business projector segments at CES 2019 and this year's ISE that feature 4K resolution, ultra short throw capability, and 3,500 lumen output.
Laser Projection
Arguably one of the fastest growing industry segments in professional A/V, laser projectors sport similar features to LED projectors, such as 20,000 hour life, virtually maintenance free operation, lower heat generation, non-standard angle mounting ability, etc.
What primarily separates laser from LED is that laser projectors can be purchased with higher lumen output (up to and potentially beyond 30,000 lumens), which means large venues can now take advantage of the long-term lower cost of ownership that solid-state light engines bring. Large churches, theaters, schools, outdoor projection mapped exhibits, and other spaces and applications that require large-format projection can utilize laser to lower costs without sacrificing brightness, color saturation or image quality.
In addition, you can find a laser option in just about every vertical in the industry, be it travel, business, education, installation, touring, etc., whereas specialized professional LED projector options for some of segments are non-existent or still coming online.
Essentially, laser projection technology is ahead of LED in these repsects at this point, though I'd expect to see that distance close over the next two years.
Conclusion
In terms of costs, we are seeing an industry-wide shift downwards, with lamp-based projection being at the bottom of the pile. Why the shift? At this point in the industry's history, we are seeing manufacturers moving away from a model dependent on customers replacing filters and lamps to simply replacing projector units as a whole.
What is the right choice for you? I would say it comes down to how many hours you plan to use your projector every week, combined with the size of your available budget. For my own projector, I personally settled for a lamp-based model with a lamp life span of 5,000 hours because it fit my budget and use-case of a couple hours a week.
However, if you need your projector for several hours per week, and/or it is going to be mounted in a hard-to-reach location, laser or LED may be a better solution for you. Bear in mind, however, that you will likely need to clean the filter once in a while, regardless of which technology you choose.
At the end of the day, it's important to do your research, as making a projector purchase for home or a business/institution could be a large financial outlay. There will be other considerations to factor into your decision as well—how many lumens you need, the ambient lighting in your space, the resolution you demand, the content you are displaying (mostly text, mostly images/movies or a mix of both?), how large a screen you need, what screen material are you using or have available, and how you predict your projection needs might change over the next five years. These are all questions you need to ask, and answer, before making your purchase to avoid buyer's remorse and ensure you're happy with your projection system now and in the future.
Tim Adams is president and chief systems designer for Timato Systems, an audio/video integration company specializing in servicing the sound, lighting, video, projection and live-streaming needs of churches and other houses of worship. He can be reached at info@timatosystems.com.
I had never experienced this symptom before, but considering lamps generally contain mercury, it made me wonder what might be silently seeping into a room even in machines without obvious symptoms.
Currently I have a dinky little led Optoma, and will be looking more at a long term lampless solution.
Mark I. Scott, I have never seen a church list a wide color gamut and matching a specific color spec as criteria for a projection system. Are they nice to have? Certainly, but it's far from the top priorities. A bright, clear image and long life are usually in the top three criteria, with noise being in the mix, as well. I know that BenQ has put a lot of attention in the last 2-3 years to color accuracy in some of their more inexpensive projectors, which is nice. But, if color accuracy is super important, chances are that the buyer is going to be looking at 3-chip units which are not aimed towards the budget-conscious. ;)
Dsouza, Rob is correct in that these are not generally considered to be "user-replaceable" light sources. The aim is more to create a budget-friendly projector with a long-life light source that will last long enough that the projector will be ready to replace with a new unit when the light source dies or has dimmed enough to justify replacement.
Sid, I'm assuming your Epson was a lamp-based projector, in which case yes, there is a burn-in process and it has an associated "aroma" with it. I've gotten used to it, but I can understand how that would be unpleasant to some. I'm not that worried about mercury because there shouldn't be that much in there. :)
Miguel, what Rob said is absolutely true; the ultrashort throw units have gotten incredibly affordable and pretty bright! I have used them for 120-inch screens without a problem. Happy to send you a video of a 4000 lumen 1080p unit projecting a 20ftx15ft image onto a ceiling from about 8' away. It's awesome!
Duncan, in a church environment, we want the best image at all times. Dynamic dimming, while useful in some situations like a classroom or boardroom, is not a feature that is cohesive in a church environment, in my opinion. What will happen is people will complain about why the image is not as bright, untrained techs will think it's time for a new projector, a new lamp, or that something is wrong, etc. There are a lot of issues with utilizing this feature in the wrong environment. Thanks for bringing it up, though!
The obvious candidate is probably the Optoma UHZ65, but I can’t help thinking I’d like to be able fish in a bigger pond (I’m no early adopter). I was also sensitive to colour wheels last time I shopped and went non-DLP. My experience with lamps (and filters) has been poor. When I replaced first, a dealer sold me a fake lamp described as OEM and then the filters were discontinued leading to me having to make my own.
That coupled with a perennially unreliable Sony model (safety cutoff switches continually going wrong) which I’ve had to hack to get and keep running nearly made me throw in the towel on projectors. I long for a decent choice of laser or LED home cinema models and will then buy one with a stock of filters.
I also hope (!) that the manufacturers begin to stand behind their 20,000 light module lifespan with commensurate warranties. At the moment the consumer is expected to pony up the higher purchase price for laser with no guarantee that the payback in terms of lifespan will be there.
Stuart
I'm leaning towards a laser projector but my home theater room is wired for a 13 foot throw distance. Screen size 16:9 on a 8 foot width
I use the projector on a daily basis for gaming, movies and watching TV.
With all this short throw distance talk not sure if i can install it without tearing a bunch of stuff apart. Something that the wife will say no to.
Will a laser projector, under 3k, function well in the above configuration?
Cheers
Murray
I can control the ambient light in the home theater room and currently project straight on to the wall. Have used high quality paint and really haven't seen a difference between the wall and several screens i've used over the years.
Is a laser screen a must have?
Stuart, first, sorry for the troubles you have had with lamp-based projectors. I have a $500 BenQ lamp that I use occasionally and when I do use it, it's for hours on end and it has held up really well!
I'm not sure I'm the best guy to be asking as I deal mostly with commercial projectors, given that I work primarily in commercial environments. However, throw some numbers out as to what is reasonable cost-wise, how big of a screen do you have, throw distance, how bright is your current PJ and are you looking for a laser LCD model (given your sensitivity to color wheels) or are you willing to look at DLP laser options?
Murray, are you using a matte white screen, is it painted? You might check out Crystal Technology Screens-seriously impressive OUTDOOR tests on video that frankly blow my mind. In terms of projector replacements, before we can talk about laser options, I need to know what kind of budget we are dealing with...
This article has helped people to choose the correct range of projectors. However, the professionals, corporates (including house of worships) and consumers will all have to be addressed separately as their requirements will vary including throw distance and screen size in the space these are placed in.
Do you have any practical heat output comparison between a laser projector and a lamp projector? I have a flight simulator setup with 3 Optoma GT1080 Darbees. They obviously output a decent amount of heat - so much that I’m my 13x16x7.5 room it becomes fairly hot and I have challenges with performance due to heat. I am considering upgrading to 1090HDRs in hopes that heat output is lesser to a degree that actually makes a difference, but I can’t find any actual comparison between sources. Any insight? Thanks in advance!
Or, you might ask this question on our Facebook user group page...
https://www.facebook.com/groups/projectorcentralsgroup