The school completed a one-week pilot
test sponsored by Texas Instruments to explore the possibilities that a 3D
curriculum can provide in middle-school
math. They utilzed an NEC NP216 3D DLP projector. According to Lauren Sanders, a
math teacher for students in fifth and sixth grades, the trial was a tremendous
success. "Our school caters to students
with learning differences and we've made a significant investment in various
learning technologies," she said. "We've
used interactive whiteboards for years,
for instance. We wanted to see if 3D
projection could make us even more effective, so we delivered three lessons on
volume, symmetry, and solid shapes over
the course of one week. It went very well.
"The kids were thrilled to participate and
loved the Xpand glasses - they thought
they were very cool. Our school has many
students with ADHD, but I found that
my class was much more focused when
we introduced the 3D lessons. Usually,
I get lots of questions through which they confirm their understanding of the
material and the processes. But this time,
I received far fewer questions - they were
more patient and eager to explore the content."
"The rotational symmetry portion was very
good in 3D since that's hard to re-create
on a two-dimensional fl at surface. Volume
was also good because they could see
complex shapes broken into cubes. Then
we'd compute the volume of each cube
and then add up the results to get the total volume. That was really helpful."
Typically, Sanders and other teachers at
Shelton teach a topic over the course of
a week. The second week is devoted to
mastery and in the third week, students
are tested on the material. "This was a much quicker pace, compared to our
usual rate," said Sanders. "But even at
that rapid pace, we saw excellent results."
Steve Robertson, statistician for the
Shelton School research team, analyzed
test scores for the pilot program, noting
improvements in test scores of students
in the 3D classroom. He compared the
improvement in pre- and post-lesson
test scores, finding that students in
3D classrooms generally saw score
improvements over students who were
taught in Shelton's standard curriculum
and with standard instructional methods.
"For all three subject areas - volume,
symmetry, and solid shapes - the test group achieved consistently better scores
than the control group," he said. "The
effect of the 3D curriculum on instruction
was meaningful compared to our standard
instruction with interactive whiteboards.
I can only speculate that the score delta
would be even greater in classrooms that
use standard whiteboards or chalkboards
today. Now, there are certainly some
constraints in our study - particularly with
our small sample sizes - but it certainly
encourages us to want to explore greater use of 3D at Shelton."
Once the pilot was complete, Sanders
realized that the "control group," which
hadn't received 3D instruction, deserved
a chance to see the lessons delivered in
3D. "I asked them, 'Looking at this, are the concepts clearer?' and it was a real 'A-ha!' moment for the kids. One of them said to
me, 'Oh - so that's what you were trying
to do on the whiteboard.' With 3D, it just
all clicked, which was neat to see.
"3D can be an important component of
teaching - but there still needs to be a
good complement of styles and tools.
I can't envision teaching a 50-minute class solely in 3D. It has to be intermixed
with manipulatives, the whiteboard,
discussions, and examples. That also
keeps the novelty of 3D, which is important."
For more detailed specifications and connections, check
out our NEC NP216 projector page.
Home / Case Studies / NEC NP216 3D Projector Pilots at the Shelton School

NEC NP216 3D Projector Pilots at the Shelton School
Case Study by Texas Instruments | Aug 13, 2010 |
At Shelton School, in Dallas, Texas the nation's largest
private school serving learning-different
students, the goal is to provide the best
individualized education path for
every student. The school provides learning-different children a full, effective
curriculum through individualized, structured
multisensory programs. Major learning
differences include dyslexia, attention
defi cit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and
speech and language disorders.