The Panasonic PT-AE7000 and the Sony VPL-HW30ES are two high-quality 3D 1080p projectors priced at $3,499 and $3,699 respectively. We set them up side by side to take a close look at how they compare.
Picture Quality
Regarding picture quality, these differences stand out:
- The HW30ES is brighter in its ideal Cinema mode, measuring 846 lumens compared to the AE7000's 526 lumens. Lumen numbers always make the difference sound more dramatic than the actual experience. You'd assume the HW30ES would look 50% brighter than the AE7000, but it doesn't work that way. The eye responds to light in a logarithmic fashion, so a 50% increase in brightness looks somewhat brighter, but the difference is not huge. The brightness difference is mostly evident in the highlights. This helps in ambient light, but is typically too bright in a dark room.
- If you are projecting in a dark theater, the HW30ES' 846 lumens can be dropped to about 540 by putting the lamp in eco mode. This makes the brightness levels virtually identical between the two units. If that level of brightness is still too high, the AE7000 can be dropped into eco mode, bringing it to about 400 lumens. The HW30ES can reduce lumen output using its manual iris, though you sacrifice the auto iris' on/off contrast boost by doing so.
- In the Cinema modes, the AE7000 shows more contrast, more color saturation, and a deeper black level than the HW30ES. The picture has more snap. Due to the higher contrast, the picture appears to have more depth and incremental sharpness. The AE7000 also has an edge in natural clarity; it looks a bit more analog, or film-like.
- If a brighter picture is required, either for a very large screen or to compensate for ambient light or room reflections, the AE7000 has Normal mode, which measures 1300 lumens. This is slightly brighter than any of the operating modes available on the HW30ES. Normal mode on the AE7000 shows exceptionally good color balance for a high lumen output factory preset. It is a bit cooler in color temperature than Cinema 1, but it can be brought very close to Cinema 1 by dropping the color temperature control two notches. Some black level is sacrificed in Normal mode compared to Cinema mode.
- In 3D operation, the AE7000 has greater clarity due to its contrast advantage as well as a lower level of crosstalk. The HW30ES is the brighter of the two, but the AE7000's greater contrast makes the image easier to see. Both of them need to be viewed in the dark to get anywhere near optimum results. In addition, the AE7000 has a 3D parallax control that adjusts parallax based upon the size screen in use. This increases viewer comfort; if the left- and right-eye images are separated by too great a distance, viewers are more likely to get headaches.
- With respect to color accuracy, our AE7000 test sample was perfectly calibrated out of the box. As a caveat, we should add that the unit we have is an engineering model. We presume, but do not know, that the calibration settings on production units will be the same as those on our test unit. Panasonic generally puts a great deal of focus on color accuracy in the design of their home theater projectors, so our guess is that production units will have optimized color calibrations. By comparison, the HW30ES required calibration to reach similar levels of performance.
- Digital Noise. The AE7000 has slightly less noise in both SD and HD. It also has a more effective noise reduction filter that can be set to low without compromising fine detail in the image. The HW30ES' noise reduction works better in SD than in HD, but increasing it too far will compromise detail and produce an undesirable airbrushed look.
Overall, the AE7000 has an edge over the HW30ES in picture quality in 2D primarily due to its contrast advantage, and in 3D due to both incremental contrast and better clarity/stability due to reduced crosstalk.

Mechanical Issues
Zoom lens and light output. The AE7000 has a powered zoom and focus lens with a 2.0x zoom range that lets you light up a 120" 16:9 screen from a throw distance of roughly 12 to 23.5 feet. The HW30ES has a slightly shorter manual zoom lens with a range of 1.6x, and a throw distance to a 120" screen of roughly 12 to 18.5 feet. So the AE7000 has an additional five feet of potential throw distance on the long end.
The problem is that the AE7000 loses up to 42% of its light output when the lens is set to maximum telephoto. So unless your particular installation has no need of the full light potential of the AE7000, that telephoto end of the zoom range is something you would want to avoid. Conversely, the HW30ES loses only 13% of its potential light at maximum telephoto, so you can pretty much use the entire range of the lens without worrying much about light output.
Lens Memory. The powered zoom/focus on the AE7000 supports a Lens Memory feature that allows the projector to automatically reconfigure its image position for 2.4 format films on a 2.4 Cinemascope format screen. The HW30ES does not have this feature. In theory, you can set up a 2.4 screen and manually move the HW30ES' lens back and forth to accommodate changes from 2.4 to 16:9, but anyone planning a 2.4 format installation will strongly prefer the automated capability on the AE7000.
Black level. The HW30ES has an aggressive auto iris, so on a complete fade to black the black level can be deeper than that of the AE7000. However in mixed content with highlights and shadow, the AE7000 has a somewhat deeper black level.
On-board vs. external IR emitter. The IR emitter on the AE7000 is built into the unit, and operates from a distance of up to 6 meters from the screen. As long as you are within this throw distance, this is the cleanest and easiest setup. The HW30ES has an external emitter that connects to the projector via an Ethernet cable. The cable is not included, but is easy to find at any electronics store. Once you acquire the cable, you must position the emitter in front of the viewers, pointed at the audience. We ended up placing it on the coffee table in front of us. But the maximum cable length is 15 meters, so in a more permanent installation, you might run the cable along the wall or ceiling and attach it to the screen frame.
Fan noise. With lamps in full power, both projectors are rather quiet, putting out a soft whisper. The AE7000 is slightly louder, but you need to stand within a couple of feet and listen closely to hear the difference. When the lamps are put into eco mode, both projectors are, for all practical purposes, silent.
Connectivity. The AE7000 has three HDMI ports, while the HW30ES has two. The AE7000 also has two 12V triggers as opposed to just one on the HW30ES.
Warranty, Price, and Availability
The Sony HW30ES includes a three-year warranty. The Panasonic AE7000 has a two-year warranty, but the second year is contingent upon registering the product with a mail-in claim. If you fail to do that, you only get one year of warranty.
At the moment, neither model includes 3D glasses with the base price. The AE7000 includes the built-in 3D IR emitter as a standard feature. The HW30ES emitter and cable are not included.
The Sony HW30ES is currently in production, and $3,699 is the effective selling price at the moment. The Panasonic AE7000 has been announced but will not be shipping until next month. We expect the AE7000's MSRP of $3,499 to be followed up with a lower MAP, or official street price, as we get closer to the actual ship date.
1. What are the actual contrast ratio numbers? I'd love to know the brightness of black vs white within a single given frame? Eg if you put up a test pattern with squares of white and black, what would you get?
2. When you talk about black levels, are you talking about: - the Sony having a black of 50 and a white of 1000 - the Panasonic having a black of 25 and a white of 1000 Or - the Sony having a black of 50 and a white of 1000 - the Panasonic having a black of 25 and a white of 500
Thanks!
Bruce Allen
(Enter the numbers as they appear
It seems like the Panasonic would be the best choice, but I'm not so sure that I would think so if I saw them next to each other. I currently have the AE3000 which I've been pretty happy with, but it looks kind of "dimmish" compared to my previous Sony projectors. I should mention that I usually blow up the picture quite a bit and I always prefer to use the normal or dynamic mode. My next projector will be used on a 192" screen (what gain to buy?) and will sure have a hard time to decide which projector to go with. Should I trust my intuition and always go with Sony for video products, or should I pick the Panasonic which I admit looks better on paper (but now also in your review).
Now to my question... Did multiple people look at your test setup? Was there anyone that preferred the picture quality of the HW30ES?
So, optimal placement for PT-5000, regarding brightness and zoom setting, would be as near the screen as reasonably possible and with zoom set near max. value.
On topic: can we hope that some further review will list measurements of brightness, contrast and color balance in 3D mode? Do the glasses cause any coloration? Is flickering noticeable? Is dual-link/Nvidia's 120 Hz video transmission supported?
and how the Frame Interpolation works, and whitout.
and colors compare to epson.
and sharpnes.
Also, this site talks up how the Panny can produce more lumens in normal mode than the Sonny can produce in any mode, but fails to compare how the Panny's normal mode picture quality stacks up against the Sony's cinema mode. It the Panny's normal mode is better and brighter than the Sony's cinema mode 846 vs 1300 then that is a huge advantage for the Panny, but obviously this is not the case or this site would have mentioned it because they are bias towards Panny's. There are no mention of ANSI contrast and no comparison of the frame interpolation systems. Also, based on a comment made in this review, it appears that the Sonny produce better blacks than the Panny in darker scenes, but this review didn't expand on this advantage. The review only focused on the dynamic and or mid range contrast advantage of the Panny. These reviews need to be more thorough and unbiased.
What I do find funny, is that I just demo's both these projectors, and me and the lady right away said the same thing "The Hw30 picture is brighter and has more POP then the Panny".
Granted, I do not own either one of these yet, I was stuck on the Panny before I seen the Sony in action in a comparison, and for me, I'm about 3 weeks away from having the extra $500 needed for the Sony, the difference was that substantial to me, and my woman. Not to mention a much better mf rate for gaming with the Sony, so less lag (Sony 30mf while Panny between 70 and 80, I have seen some people measure it at 50mf but the Panny is inconsistant).
You will see many, many people around the Internet use the saying "Jack of all trades" when it comes to the Sony Hw30, it does everything good, nothing bad, but is not the best at anything. The Sony is basically the only Projector without a major archili's heel.
Looking forward to receiving my Sony in a could weeks, can't wait! :)